The working
0.48% of your home’s value, worked out
0.48% of £300,000 is £1,440 a year — £120 a month. That’s the whole sum: the proposal charges 0.48% of what your home is worth today, every year, in place of council tax. Here it is at the values people ask about most.
None of this is policy yet. Whether any of it moves is a question for the Autumn Budget on 28 October 2026 — I keep a running note there of what’s confirmed, what’s on the table, and what looks unlikely to shift.
| Home value | 0.48% a year | Per month | vs Band D council tax |
|---|
Second homes, long-term empty homes and non-resident owners pay 0.96% — double every figure above. The comparison column follows the nation you pick above — use the calculator for your own band. Tap any row to load it.
Why this calculator
Your bill, not a headline
National averages hide who actually wins and loses. This runs the 0.48% on your home against your council tax, so the answer is personal.
Built on the real proposal
0.48% on current value, 0.96% on second homes, the £1,200 transitional cap, stamp duty scrapped on main homes — the figures campaigners actually published.
Shows your break-even
It tells you the exact home value where the new tax would match your current bill — so you can see how far either side of the line you sit.
See it across your whole financial picture
A change to your biggest annual bill ripples through everything. WealthR tracks your net worth, forecasts and tax in one place.
The 0.48% proportional property tax, explained
In the summer of 2026, Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham put a long-running campaigner idea back on the front pages: scrap council tax and, for main homes, stamp duty, and replace them with a single annual charge of 0.48% of a property's current market value. The idea has been pushed for years by the Fairer Share campaign; 0.48% is the rate they calculate would raise roughly the same money as the two taxes it replaces.
The appeal is simple to state. Council tax is still based on 1991 property valuations and a set of A–H bands that have never been revalued in England. That makes it sharply regressive: a modest home can pay a higher percentage of its value than a mansion. A charge tied to what a home is worth today would, supporters argue, be fairer and more transparent.
How the numbers work
- 0.48% a year on current value. A £300,000 home pays £1,440; a £500,000 home pays £2,400; a £1m home pays £4,800.
- Stamp duty scrapped on main homes. You'd no longer pay a large one-off tax when you buy your home — a separate saving on top of the annual comparison.
- Second homes pay double — 0.96%. The same higher rate applies to long-term empty properties and homes owned by non-residents. Stamp duty would be kept for those buyers.
- A £1,200 transitional cap. Existing owners couldn't see their bill jump by more than £1,200 a year above their current council tax during the transition; the cap lifts when the property is next sold.
- Deferral for pensioners. Asset-rich but cash-poor owners could defer paying until the home is eventually sold, so nobody is forced out by a paper valuation.
Who wins and who loses
Because the charge follows current value, the map of winners and losers is really a map of house prices. The Fairer Share campaign estimates roughly 77% of households would pay less. Broadly, lower-value homes and much of the Midlands and the North tend to gain, while high-value properties concentrated in London and the South East tend to pay more. As one illustration, the Centre for London estimated a £600,000 London home would pay about £812 a year more than a typical Band D council-tax bill. Your own result comes down to one number: your break-even value — your current bill divided by 0.48%. On the England average Band D bill of £2,392, that break-even is about £498,000.
Is it actually going to happen?
Not yet — and it may not at all. This is a proposal under debate, not government policy. No government has adopted it; the next opportunity is the Autumn Budget on 28 October 2026. Any real reform would involve a nationwide revaluation, primary legislation, and years of transition. Treat every figure here as an illustration of what the proposal would mean for you — useful for understanding the debate and your own exposure, not a forecast of next year's bill. We track where this proposal goes next on WealthR Live.
Common questions
Does this work for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland?
Two things worth being straight about: the 0.48% plan is an England proposal, because council tax is devolved. And it scraps stamp duty, which doesn’t exist in Scotland (Land and Buildings Transaction Tax) or Wales (Land Transaction Tax). For those nations, treat this as “what it would look like if applied here”.
Why is my Scottish bill higher than the figure shown?
What is 0.48% of £300,000?
How do I find my council tax band?
What is the proportional property tax?
Where does the 0.48% figure come from?
Would it really replace stamp duty?
Who pays more and who pays less?
What is my break-even property value?
How are second homes treated?
What if my bill would go up a lot?
Is this government policy?
Read the full breakdown
Our explainer walks through the winners and losers by region, the second-home rules, and how it stacks up against the council tax you pay today.